This is a
stacked question when you consider the matter of offering ISO 9001 counseling
administrations. So why might I even suggest this theme and shoot myself in the
foot? My primary goal is to advise you of ISO 9001 in plain English and in an
unprejudiced way. That is the general purpose of this site (forthcoming a
website...assuming the web designers ever get around to completing the
job...but that is another story). In the event that I am sufficiently lucky to
acquire somebody's business as an aftereffect of what I am passing on this
site, awesome. Clearly I need to bring home the bacon in light of my ability
and elucidation of ISO 9001 audit.
How about we dissect this stacked inquiry in more detail.
The theme became
obvious today in addressing somebody who works for a vast, worldwide
pharmaceutical organization. Basically, this organization no more saw quality
in keeping up ISO 9001 accreditation so they dropped it. The organization works
in a vigorously controlled industry. They have reviews for regulation A one
day, reviews for regulation B the following and reviews for regulation C the
following day after that. Senior administration felt ISO 9001 reviews were
acting as a burden and really turned out to be counter-beneficial. They felt
certain about keeping up consistence to other industry regulations and I can
comprehend why.
When I think
further on this discussion, I need to think about whether senior administration
may have bungled ISO 9001. Did their ISO specialist fail and/or was the
Management Representative sleeping at the worst possible time? What of the way
that this organization worked in a profoundly directed environment? Who is to
say that regulation A, B or C aren't obsolete, pointless, excess, ineffectively
outlined and ISO 9001 took the shot?
